* We get a noise figure of "0.2cps" = 12cpm (which no one wants to talk about), but nowhere do we see the stated gamma sensitivity. I see companies which use LND G-M tubes stating sensitivity in a calibrated 1000uR/hr field of cesium-137 radiation --which lobs the count way above any contested levels of internal noise and/or local "background" levels. Those of us doing low level background monitoring then interpret (say) a spec of 3500cpm at 1000uR/hr --to meaningfully indicate 10 uR/hr (0.10 uSv/hr) at 35cpm.
* For what it's worth, using GeigerGraph-4.3 software and the GQ supplied USB adapter cable, I carefully compared the response of a GMC-200 to a Medcom "Inspector" Geiger counter --in a typical (one meter above the ground) outdoor field of background radiation here --and came up with 16cpm at 0.10 uSv/hr --for what I take to be gamma --but who knows what percentage is actually cosmic/muons and internal G-M tube noise? At least that 16cpm should put you on the same page with everyone else --confused as we all might be about what we're actually counting.
* It appears that GQ Electronics software sets an M4011 tubes response to 10 uR/hr at 20cpm. (I don't think the difference is a big deal.)
According to government sources we have a background of 77nSv/h ( h**p://sfws.lfrz.at/) According to the data sheet tube noise is at 0.2cps which is 12cpm.
At the given background radiation of 77nSv/h my GMC320 shows 19cpm. Now, if I take the tube noise into consideration this would mean 19 - 12 = 7cpm = 77nSv/h
So, either tube noise data are wrong or the tube is crap (at least unusable for background measurement)