GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum Active Users: / Visits Today:
Highest Active Users:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 GQ Electronics Forums
 2.GQ Geiger Muller Counter
 GMC-800Re2.00 - new Hardware incompatible and slow

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List Spell Checker
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File
Check here to include your profile signature.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
ullix Posted - 07/04/2026 : 05:08:20
The GMC-800 is being sold now in a fully new hardware version. It reports itself as GMC-800Re2.00, and is incompatible with previous versions of GeigerLog and RadPro!

GeigerLog has now been adapted; its latest version is available as a pre-release on GeigerLog's development site. Use pre08 or later:
https://sourceforge.net/p/geigerlog/discussion/devel2/

The use of a new microchip raises hopes for getting fast performance. Well, the opposite was the case! For the first time ever I had in insert delays (!) at various stages of the GeigerLog code, just to accomododate this one counter. Imagine, even the old GQ clunkers GMC-300 were faster!

Adapting RadPro might take a bit longer; GQ has resorted to grinding off all labels on the chips, which does throw a few extra wrenches into anyone's attempts to create alternative firmware.



And the much dreaded FET "feature" has been runied even further. The picture shows the outcome for a Poisson test for FET=5 in the top pic. This is supposed to look like the bottom pic, which is the History read out from the very same GMC-800Re2.00. The data are there; they are just ruined by GQ's infamous algorithm !



Draw your own conclusions.

GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum © Copyright since 2011 Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.07 sec. Snitz's Forums 2000