GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum Active Users: / Visits Today:
Highest Active Users:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 GQ Electronics Forums
 2.GQ Geiger Muller Counter
 GMC-500 Average CPM increasing over time

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List Spell Checker
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File
Check here to include your profile signature.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
FE678 Posted - 07/03/2021 : 02:19:26
Hi,

Can anyone offer me some advice?

I have plotted the data from my GMC500 counter over around a one year period and notice that the average count has increased over time. The device has been moved to various positions in the house and occasionally taken outside, but on average the trend seems to be an increase in the count rate. Each data point is recorded at 1 minute intervals, and the red line is the 99 data point moving average. Is this a behaviour of the counter due to battery aging etc? Or is this because there is a build up of radiation in my house?
7   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Damien68 Posted - 07/03/2021 : 14:23:01
Hi FE678,
with a mean value of 32.5CPM and a total of 475402-440000 = 35402 Sample:
The Gaussian should peak at a value of 35402 / (5.7 / 0.399) = 2478 occurrences. but on your histogram it culminates at 2100 occurrences.
we also see that the distribution hystogram is not centered on mean value and be much larger than it should be if the distribution were Poissonnienne.
So we can simply conclude that your distribution is not Poissonian.

The reason is not obvious to understand.
The easiest would be to have a second counter to confirm or not the variations, but they can be natural (related to the environment), I would rather go for this hypothesis.
At home I have an average of 31 CPM inside my home and outside my home an average of around 22 CPM. if I approach the meter to a wall, it goes even higher.
FE678 Posted - 07/03/2021 : 11:41:51
Here is data from the last week only

FE678 Posted - 07/03/2021 : 11:26:17
Thanks for deciding to help me. This is data after 440000. It does include the counter being left in a number of different locations for a day or two and represents about a month of data.

Damien68 Posted - 07/03/2021 : 05:39:38
At the end of your recording the red and blue curve are no longer centered together. it may be aliasing effects but I have the impression that the signal is no longer Poissonian nor Gaussian at all, which would mean that it's not your environment that is accumulating radioactivity.
So if you can plot histogram from sample 440000 to the end of your recording, this corespond to a pseudo stationary state, and would allow to know whether or not the signal is Gaussian and Poissonian.

FE678 Posted - 07/03/2021 : 02:34:11
FE678 Posted - 07/03/2021 : 02:21:36
FE678 Posted - 07/03/2021 : 02:20:47
Having issues uploading the graph... says I have to be logged in, but think I am...

GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum © Copyright since 2011 Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.08 sec. Snitz's Forums 2000