GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum Active Users: / Visits Today:
Highest Active Users:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
 Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 GQ Electronics Forums
 3. GQ EMF EF Meter RF Spectrum Power Analyzer
 Old 115VAC wiring w/no GND = High V/m readings?

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List Spell Checker
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File
 Check here to include your profile signature.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Lauerkj Posted - 01/14/2021 : 20:07:58
I have two bedrooms with very similar arrangement of wall plugs, night stands, lamps, etc. One has EF readings near the bed pillows of around 55V/m and the other has EF readings of around 5V/m near the bed pillows! Lamps and clocks are the same. Could it be that the lower EF bedroom is wired with 3 wire plugs (ground wire) and the higher EF room is wired with 2 wire plugs (no ground wire)? I rotated the EMF-390 meter and the above readings are the highest identified for both locations.
1   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
EmfDev Posted - 01/19/2021 : 15:12:41
Hi Lauerkj, those are mostly static EF from the lamp. The lamp has very high EF and can polarize objects around it. Grounding also is better. But <100V/m in static EF is not necessarily bad since they are mostly static.

GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum © Copyright since 2011 Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.04 sec. Snitz's Forums 2000