| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Shawndominico@gmail.com |
Posted - 02/12/2018 : 12:42:46
70-80mG @ 60-120 Hz level for long periods of time?
|
| 9 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Linder Avalos |
Posted - 02/09/2024 : 09:36:30
quote:
Originally posted by Damien68
I fully agree with you.
and government limits are often taken as a precaution.
there are a lot of dreadful conspiracy theorists who don't mind reversing everything and saying anything using what we call stupid retoriques in order to be able to put water to their mills and sell books .
it would be nice if GQ could do moron detectors. 
perhaps they think they want to save the world, but they poison it.
intelligence can only be collective and therefore necessarily accompanied by rules and respect, intelligence is not in fear and intimidation, this is more the business of sect gurus or riot leader
No, me parece inteligente la forma de expresarse de este señor.
En todo caso después de varios años de radiofrecuencias, ya debería haber un estudio definitivo para no solo basarnos en suposiciones.
Desde luego quienes aprovechan eso son los que hacen dinero.
Sin más; la ciencia no es bufonería, es experimentación no solo teoría. Si estos grupos tuvieran la certeza que la radiofrecuencia no es dañina, todos sus bufones y medios de comunicación asalariados ya lo estarían divulgando con pruebas verificables y repetibles.
"Una demostración de inteligencia es aprovechar la de los demás". "No se puede capar la opinion por que serias un miserable dictador"
|
| Damien68 |
Posted - 01/07/2021 : 16:15:13
I fully agree with you.
and government limits are often taken as a precaution.
there are a lot of dreadful conspiracy theorists who don't mind reversing everything and saying anything using what we call stupid retoriques in order to be able to put water to their mills and sell books .
it would be nice if GQ could do moron detectors.
perhaps they think they want to save the world, but they poison it.
intelligence can only be collective and therefore necessarily accompanied by rules and respect, intelligence is not in fear and intimidation, this is more the business of sect gurus or riot leader |
| ihab17 |
Posted - 01/05/2021 : 14:56:04
Well, I have looked at some of the links you folks provided and some are just misinformed articles with no evidence at all. The first bogus site is this https://www.electricsense.com/5029/fcc-safety-limits-for-electric-fields-magnetic-fields-rf-radiation/
Any non-government and non-scientific evidence-based information should be taken with extreme caution. I'm still looking for official scientific papers to backup the claims I read. Sure, too much EF for too long isn't something anyone would want to live in, but what are the safe limits amd the exposure time to trigger an alert is the fundamental question. I don't like those conspiracy theorists and prefer a scientific paper with data samples and empirical evidence.
My 2 cents |
| Bill D. |
Posted - 07/15/2020 : 09:30:46
Here is the latest IARC monograph on Non-ionizing Radiation (2013): h**ps://publications.iarc.fr/126
Conclusion (419): There is limited evidence that RF radiation is carcinogenic. RF fields are classified as possibly carcinogenic.
Excellent British site with detailed information on EMF, especially power lines. h**p://www.emfs.info/sources/overhead/summaries/
|
| bobinski |
Posted - 05/11/2019 : 22:41:52
Here's a link to over 149 pages of references to scientific studies!
There's loads of evidence for the harm this stuff causes.
https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/studies.asp |
| EmfDev |
Posted - 05/18/2018 : 09:40:29
I found a link that exactly says the safety limit exposure.
https://www.electricsense.com/5029/fcc-safety-limits-for-electric-fields-magnetic-fields-rf-radiation/
it says limit for general public is 27.5 for 30-300 MHz. |
| ZLM |
Posted - 04/26/2018 : 17:06:33
The char from EPA:
EPA EMF Information:
41338 bytes
From US Government National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS),near a power line?
790774 bytes
The example of measurement:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxnb2Hc1kpI
|
| ZLM |
Posted - 04/26/2018 : 17:04:04
For some information from government site:
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/ |
| Shawndominico@gmail.com |
Posted - 02/14/2018 : 07:42:37
A possible source document.
h**p://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol80/mono80-6E.pdf
5.5 Evaluation
There is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of extremely lowfrequency
magnetic fields in relation to childhood leukaemia.
There is inadequate evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of extremely lowfrequency
magnetic fields in relation to all other cancers.
There is inadequate evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of static electric
or magnetic fields and extremely low-frequency electric fields.
There is inadequate evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of
extremely low-frequency magnetic fields.
No data relevant to the carcinogenicity of static electric or magnetic fields and
extremely low-frequency electric fields in experimental animals were available.
Overall evaluation
Extremely low-frequency magnetic fields are possibly carcinogenic to humans
(Group 2B).
Static electric and magnetic fields and extremely low-frequency electric fields are
not classifiable as to their carcinogenicity to humans (Group 3).
|
