All Forums  GQ Electronics Forums  3. GQ EMF EF Meter RF Spectrum Power Analyzer  GQ emf 390 vs trifield tf2

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize: 640 x 480 800 x 600 1024 x 768 1280 x 1024 UserName: Password: Format Mode: Basic  Help  Prompt  Format: Font Andale Mono Arial Arial Black Book Antiqua Century Gothic Comic Sans MS Courier New Georgia Impact Lucida Console Script MT Bold Stencil Tahoma Times New Roman Trebuchet MS Verdana   Size 1 2 3 4 5 6   Color Black Red Yellow Pink Green Orange Purple Blue Beige Brown Teal Navy Maroon LimeGreen Message: * HTML is OFF * Forum Code is ON Smilies [quote][i]Originally posted by giwrgosxan[/i] [br]Upon checking radiation activity in my apartment and crosschecking the values of GQ emf 390 with the values of Trifield TF2, I found out that the RF values of the trifield in a room were very high when putting the device on the wall, allthough in the middle area of the room the rf values were much lower. On the other hand, the GQ emf 390 at the same places was showing different values, but not so much. For example the trifield tf2 at the wall was showing above 15mV/m2 and at the middle of the room 2-3mV/m2 and the gq emf 390 was showing 2-3 mV/m2 at the wall and under 1 mV/m2 at the middle of the room. Which device is more accurate to trust? I have to mention that there are no cell towers at a distance closer than 250 meters and the is a cb transmitter antenna at a building whick is located at a distance of 80-90 meters from my apartment. [/quote]    Insert an Image File Check here to include your profile signature.