| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| giwrgosxan |
Posted - 01/22/2025 : 13:32:59
Upon checking radiation activity in my apartment and crosschecking the values of GQ emf 390 with the values of Trifield TF2, I found out that the RF values of the trifield in a room were very high when putting the device on the wall, allthough in the middle area of the room the rf values were much lower. On the other hand, the GQ emf 390 at the same places was showing different values, but not so much. For example the trifield tf2 at the wall was showing above 15mV/m2 and at the middle of the room 2-3mV/m2 and the gq emf 390 was showing 2-3 mV/m2 at the wall and under 1 mV/m2 at the middle of the room. Which device is more accurate to trust? I have to mention that there are no cell towers at a distance closer than 250 meters and the is a cb transmitter antenna at a building whick is located at a distance of 80-90 meters from my apartment. |
| 1 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| EmfDev |
Posted - 01/23/2025 : 10:53:30
Is there a WiFi router on the other side of the wall? If there are no other RF sources around, it mat just be showing RF noise from the power lines on the wall. |
|
|
