GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum Active Users: / Visits Today:
Highest Active Users:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
 Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 GQ Electronics Forums
 1.Geiger Counter World Map(www.GMCmap.com)
 Radiation World Map uSv/h?

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List Spell Checker
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File
 Check here to include your profile signature.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
1967 Posted - 10/05/2022 : 12:00:34
Good morning everyone.
Recently, I have published my geieger data on the World Map site.
I noticed that the values of the various stations are expressed in CPM.
We know that for a GMC 600+, 50 cpm is equivalent to 0.143 uSv / h (50/348) but the same cannot be said for a GMC 500+ that uses another coefficient ...
So if for a gmc600 + a value of 50 cpm is equivalent to the bottom, this cannot be said also for a gmc 320 or gmc500 +.
Wouldn't it have been better to indicate the values expressed in uSv / h (which should be the same for all) instead of the CPMs which are subjective to the type of geiger used?
1   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
EmfDev Posted - 10/05/2022 : 15:34:30
Hi 1967, you are correct. That is a good suggestion, I will forward it to support.

GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum © Copyright since 2011 Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.05 sec. Snitz's Forums 2000