| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
gvero
3 Posts |
 Posted - 12/26/2019 : 13:14:13
|
Hello, I am slightly confused between this two, which one is more adequate to get
realistic measurements of harmful exposure, "sensitive" mode is showing like x20-30 over
standard way of measuring...
regards |
|
| Reply #1
EmfDev
2250 Posts |
Posted - 12/26/2019 : 13:41:41
|
| Hi gvero, from from the faq section: "The Standard mode on this meter is referring to average reading. Which is the reading been calibrated to a RSM reading standard. The Sensitive mode mostly reports RF pulse peak value. Most signals today are digital. Digital signals are RF pulse signal (composed of a series of short bursts pulses). The amplitude of pulses can differ by many times, sometimes more than 100 times." |
 |
|
| Reply #2
gvero
3 Posts |
Posted - 12/29/2019 : 09:38:59
|
quote:
Originally posted by EmfDev
Hi gvero, from from the faq section: "The Standard mode on this meter is referring to average reading. Which is the reading been calibrated to a RSM reading standard. The Sensitive mode mostly reports RF pulse peak value. Most signals today are digital. Digital signals are RF pulse signal (composed of a series of short bursts pulses). The amplitude of pulses can differ by many times, sometimes more than 100 times."
Yes, I read that before posting here since I am not sure which route to follow from that description, shall I stay with sensitive mode since most of signal is digital these days? |
Edited by - gvero on 12/29/2019 11:12:52 |
|
|
| Reply #3
paul
United Kingdom
54 Posts |
Posted - 12/29/2019 : 11:26:17
|
To get "realistic measurements of harmful exposure" it is best
to use RF Browser mode.Which is not affected by Sensitive or Standard.
Vertical and All In One are a bit slow for true,fast peak digital
measurements. |
|
|
| Reply #4
EmfDev
2250 Posts |
Posted - 12/30/2019 : 10:32:19
|
| Yes we prefer standard. The reading on standard is from the data in RF Browser. |
|
|
| Reply #5
gvero
3 Posts |
Posted - 01/12/2020 : 07:42:02
|
| Thank you very much to both of you.. cheers |
|
|
| Reply #6
taekotra
7 Posts |
Posted - 01/16/2020 : 22:11:12
|
Does anyone know how that value is calculated when in Sensitive mode?
The manual says it represents "Total in all bands" (in Standard or Sensitive I assume).
So is it collecting various peaks from various bands and summing the densities?
Or is it taking the peak density in any band and summing the pulses at that peak?
Or something else...?
|
Edited by - taekotra on 01/16/2020 23:02:06 |
|
|
| Reply #7
EmfDev
2250 Posts |
Posted - 01/17/2020 : 10:21:27
|
| Hi taekotra, the sensitive is taking the peaks in all bands including the 2.4GHz - 2.5GHz and 240-1040MHz. While the standard is taking average. |
|
|
| Reply #8
taekotra
7 Posts |
Posted - 01/17/2020 : 14:29:32
|
quote:
Originally posted by EmfDev
Hi taekotra, the sensitive is taking the peaks in all bands including the 2.4GHz - 2.5GHz and 240-1040MHz. While the standard is taking average.
This seems not to be true because the display claims ".24 - 10Ghz" and the manual stating "up to 10Ghz". I understand that it's only the RF Spectrum mode that is limited to the 2.4GHz - 2.5GHz and 240-1040MHz bands.
So Sensitive should be taking the peaks at various bands (which ones?) from the whole 240Mhz - 10Ghz range. Can you confirm?
|
Edited by - taekotra on 01/17/2020 15:18:46 |
|
|
| Reply #9
EmfDev
2250 Posts |
Posted - 01/17/2020 : 15:53:34
|
| It is taking peaks in all bands from 240MHz - 10GHz (including peaks from 2.4GHz - 2.5GHz and 240-1040MHz bands). |
|
|
| Reply #10
taekotra
7 Posts |
Posted - 01/17/2020 : 16:25:34
|
quote:
Originally posted by EmfDev
It is taking peaks in all bands from 240MHz - 10GHz (including peaks from 2.4GHz - 2.5GHz and 240-1040MHz bands).
Do you mean this range is divided into 4 bands, then?
240 - 1040MHz
1041Mhz - 2.399Ghz
2.4 - 2.5GHz
2.501 - 10Ghz
Sensitive mode takes the peaks from these 4 bands and sums them? Or are there more bands? |
Edited by - taekotra on 01/17/2020 16:27:55 |
|
|
| Reply #11
EmfDev
2250 Posts |
Posted - 01/17/2020 : 17:01:21
|
| It has a 240-10GHz general band but it also gets the 240 and 2.4GHz bands. |
|
|
| Reply #12
taekotra
7 Posts |
Posted - 01/17/2020 : 17:25:56
|
quote:
Originally posted by EmfDev
It has a 240-10GHz general band but it also gets the 240 and 2.4GHz bands.
How many peaks does Sensitive mode take per sample? |
|
|
| Reply #13
EmfDev
2250 Posts |
Posted - 01/21/2020 : 10:36:05
|
| More than 1000 peaks every second. |
|
|
| Reply #14
taekotra
7 Posts |
Posted - 01/21/2020 : 22:11:26
|
quote:
Originally posted by EmfDev
More than 1000 peaks every second.
From this set of 1000+ peaks, what manipulations are applied to generate the "Total in all bands" reading? |
Edited by - taekotra on 01/21/2020 22:42:34 |
|
|
| Reply #15
EmfDev
2250 Posts |
Posted - 01/22/2020 : 10:23:28
|
| I am not sure, I need to check this one. |
|
|
| Reply #16
taekotra
7 Posts |
Posted - 01/23/2020 : 17:25:13
|
quote:
Originally posted by EmfDev
I am not sure, I need to check this one.
Thanks, looking forward to it! |
|
|
| Reply #17
user18
4 Posts |
Posted - 01/26/2020 : 08:34:18
|
quote:
Originally posted by taekotra
quote:
Originally posted by EmfDev
I am not sure, I need to check this one.
Thanks, looking forward to it!
I am also interested in this one, I really get curious when Sensitive reading differs from Standard by a lot (it does not always differ that much).
BTW, I have neve seen a stable Sensitive RF reading below ca. 2.5 mW/m2, that seems to be a kind of minimum value. |
|
|
| Reply #18
taekotra
7 Posts |
Posted - 05/28/2020 : 17:06:19
|
We are still looking for an answer.
In Sensitive Mode, the GQ390 is taking 1000+ peaks/second.
Again, the question is:
----- How is the "Total In All Bands" value generated? What calculation is applied to the 1000+ peaks? -----
|
Edited by - taekotra on 05/28/2020 17:29:30 |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
GQ390 RF(standard/Sensitive)
