GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum Active Users: / Visits Today:
Highest Active Users:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 GQ Electronics Forums
 2.GQ Geiger Muller Counter
 GMC 600+ Power Supply Audio Question
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Bobakman

USA
97 Posts

Posted - 02/10/2023 :  18:56:49  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Please view the linked videos.
I Noticed while measuring at a high count rate above 160K with the speaker enabled that the audio eventually drops out. One video I had the tube voltage set to 505V the second set to 530V to see if things differed and they did the audio drops out a bit sooner at the lower voltage and at a slightly lower count rate compared to the slightly higher setting.
My question then, is the audio dropping out (it tapers down to zero audio by the sound) due to loss of power due to the tube consuming more voltage and current from the extreme avalanche causing a lower voltage to be available to the audio power circuit? Or is the loss of audio by design since 160K clicks is basically a constant tone beyond the capability of the audio circuitry?

Bob


[https://youtube.com/shorts/yWoW77uvRGM?feature=share]

[https://youtube.com/shorts/NJLNZcTHZaQ?feature=share]

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”
Nikola Tesla

Edited by - Bobakman on 02/10/2023 23:32:29
Reply #1

ihab17

Italy
218 Posts

Posted - 02/11/2023 :  09:24:37  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Bobakman
Bob
[https://youtube.com/shorts/yWoW77uvRGM?feature=share]

[https://youtube.com/shorts/NJLNZcTHZaQ?feature=share]



Interesting videos. I don't think any of the commercial counters, be it GMC or others, are designed to handle or measure such high radiation count rate. What was the source of your radiation?
Go to Top of Page
Reply #2

Bobakman

USA
97 Posts

Posted - 02/11/2023 :  11:00:41  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
A 30+ year old CS-137 10 uci check source.
I pretty much figured as you stated but it never hurts to ask.

Bob

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”
Nikola Tesla
Go to Top of Page
Reply #3

ihab17

Italy
218 Posts

Posted - 02/11/2023 :  14:17:17  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Bobakman

A 30+ year old CS-137 10 uci check source.
I pretty much figured as you stated but it never hurts to ask.

Bob


Wow! 30+? Go figure 30+ years ago! It was even double the count rate!
Go to Top of Page
Reply #4

EmfDev

2250 Posts

Posted - 02/13/2023 :  13:43:40  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It may be due to the high frequency on count that the speaker cannot handle. For the CPM difference, I saw on the first video that there was a delay on when you put the 600+ to the source, that may have cause the effect that it was slower than another.
Go to Top of Page
Reply #5

Bobakman

USA
97 Posts

Posted - 02/13/2023 :  14:39:10  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks EmfDev for confirming. :>)

Bob

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”
Nikola Tesla
Go to Top of Page
Reply #6

ullix

Germany
1171 Posts

Posted - 02/14/2023 :  00:40:52  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
This is very likely due to a collapsing of the anode voltage, because the High-Voltage generator is not powerful enough to support this high load on the tube.

Such things had been discussed already many years ago. Look at this forum topic:
http://www.gqelectronicsllc.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5369

Relevant parts start at reply #15
Go to Top of Page
Reply #7

Damien68

France
780 Posts

Posted - 02/15/2023 :  09:24:47  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
on the video after placing the counter on the source, we see the voltage of the HV generator drop from 500v to 385v then gradually rise from 385v to 398v (54 to 70%), this may explain the delay. in fact at the start of strong exposure the tube must be under powered (385v) and does not detect all the particles that he should so the count is still low enough to have the audio. after, the voltage increases and we obtain a pulse rate too high for the R3/C7 filter which cuts the audio.
R3/C7 filter enlarge by (220kohms*1nF= 220uS) the tube's detection pulse which is already 140uS which makes a "pulse width" of 140uS + 220uS = 360uS.
On the video the audio switch off at 150 000 CPM = 2500 CPS
1/(2500 CPS) = 400uS which is consistent with this theory. but this should only affect the audio and the loss of the audio path should not disturb the counts made by the microcontroller.

Mastery is acquired by studying, with it everything becomes simple

Edited by - Damien68 on 02/15/2023 09:54:31
Go to Top of Page
Reply #8

ullix

Germany
1171 Posts

Posted - 02/15/2023 :  23:18:02  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It is a bit hilarious when you realize that at CPM=160k, equalt o CPS=2600 you reach the point when a deadtime correction begins to become relevant.

But at this point the anode voltage collapses, and makes the need for any deadtime correction superfluous ;-)
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum © Copyright since 2011 Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.08 sec. Snitz's Forums 2000