GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum Active Users: / Visits Today:
Highest Active Users:
GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
 Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 GQ Electronics Forums
 2.GQ Geiger Muller Counter
 GMC-320 and sun

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List Spell Checker
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File
 Check here to include your profile signature.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
jjfr Posted - 03/08/2014 : 01:54:00
Hello,

We buy near end december 3 GMC-320. Just to see the result I remove the cover and let CG under the sun (not really violent in this season in France). 2 CG don't move (20/25CPM) but the third give 600CPM and go back to normal few minutes after. Without this solar exposition this last CG give coherent values with the others.

Did you have and idea of the problem ? How can I solve it ?

Thanks.

JJ
3   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
ZLM Posted - 03/11/2014 : 22:09:11
"tube related" means this problem is caused by direct sunlight on the tube. Sorry, it is my own term. :)
jjfr Posted - 03/10/2014 : 06:38:14
Hi,
What do you mean by "tube related" ? the tube is dead ?

JJ
ZLM Posted - 03/08/2014 : 15:01:58
This is tube related.
However, the GMC-320 is designed to work correctly with the cover, not direct sunlight on the tube.

GQ Electronics Technical Support Forum © Copyright since 2011 Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.05 sec. Snitz's Forums 2000